Hi, How Can We Help You?

FREE CONSULTATION

928 776-1782

CALL NOW

Ted Agnick | DUI & Criminal Attorney

140 N Montezuma Street
Prescott, AZ 86301

Author Archives: admin

February 25, 2025
Posted on Author By admin Categories Defense Strategies

Mental States and Crime

U.S.-police-officer-arresting-a-man-dressed-in-a-full-chicken-costume

The Mental State Requirement in Criminal Law Cases

Ted Law | Prescott Criminal Defense Attorney
Call (928) 776-1782 for a Free Consultation

Under Arizona and federal law, most crimes require the prosecution to prove more than just an illegal act. They must also show that the defendant acted with a certain mental state—often called the “mens rea” or “guilty mind.” In the Prescott area, understanding these mental state requirements can be critical to forming an effective defense if you’re facing criminal charges.

Overview of Mens Rea

Modern criminal law typically divides mental states into four main levels, following the Model Penal Code (MPC): purpose, knowledge, recklessness, and negligence. Although the MPC is not binding in every jurisdiction, it heavily influences how courts interpret mental states.

  • Purpose: The defendant consciously intended a specific result.
  • Knowledge: The defendant was practically certain that a result would occur from their actions.
  • Recklessness: The defendant was aware of a substantial risk but chose to disregard it.
  • Negligence: The defendant failed to recognize a substantial risk that a reasonable person would have noticed.

In many cases, prosecutors will also argue that the defendant had a motive to commit the crime, which can reinforce the government’s proof of mental state. However, a motive is not a required element—someone may be guilty even without a strong reason if they meet the other criteria of the crime.

Purpose and Knowledge

“Purpose” and “knowledge” represent the highest levels of culpability. A purposeful defendant wants a particular outcome, while a knowledgeable defendant knows that outcome is virtually certain, even if they don’t desire it. From the law’s perspective, however, the distinction between knowledge and purpose often doesn’t lead to a different punishment, since both indicate a high degree of blameworthiness.

Specific vs. General Intent

Some jurisdictions, including parts of Arizona, still use “specific intent” and “general intent” instead of the MPC’s approach. Generally, “purpose” aligns with specific intent, and “knowledge” aligns with general intent. Courts vary in how they interpret these terms, so having a local Prescott criminal defense lawyer who understands the nuances is crucial.

Common Defenses for Purpose and Knowledge

One way to undermine an accusation of purpose or knowledge is by showing a genuine mistake of fact. For example, if you mistakenly believed that property you took was your own, you might negate the intent to commit theft. A successful mistake of fact defense requires a credible reason for the misunderstanding.

Recklessness and Negligence

Even if a defendant didn’t want a certain outcome or know it would happen, they could still face criminal liability under a recklessness or negligence standard.

  • Recklessness: A conscious disregard of a substantial, unjustifiable risk—though not necessarily probable or likely.
  • Negligence: Failure to recognize a substantial, unjustifiable risk that a reasonable person would have identified.

While negligence is the least blameworthy mental state under criminal law, it can still lead to serious felony charges in extreme cases—like negligent homicide—if someone’s death results from your careless behavior.

Negligence also plays a major role in many civil suits, but criminal negligence typically involves a “gross deviation” from the standard of care, and prosecutors must meet a higher burden of proof than in civil cases.

Strict Liability Offenses

Certain crimes do not require proof of any mental state at all. These are known as strict liability offenses, and a defendant can be convicted regardless of their intentions or awareness.

  • Traffic Violations: Many states treat speeding or seatbelt violations as strict liability offenses.
  • Alcohol-Related Offenses: Underage alcohol sales, for example, may not require proof of intent.
  • Statutory Rape: Some states, including Arizona, have strict liability laws regarding age of consent, making a defendant guilty even if they reasonably believed the minor was older.

Although penalties for strict liability crimes are often lower, some—like statutory rape—can lead to severe consequences.

How a Prescott Defense Attorney Can Help

Whether you’re accused of acting purposefully, recklessly, or under strict liability, the mental state requirement can significantly impact both your defense and potential penalties. A local attorney can help you by:

  • Evaluating the Evidence to see if the prosecution truly can meet its burden of proof regarding mens rea.
  • Raising Appropriate Defenses, such as mistake of fact or lack of intent.
  • Negotiating with Prosecutors to reduce charges or seek alternatives to incarceration when possible.

Contact Ted Law in Prescott

If you’ve been charged with a crime in Yavapai County and have questions about the mens rea element in your case, don’t hesitate to reach out for guidance.
Call (928) 776-1782 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation. Let us help protect your rights and build the strongest defense possible.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for general educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, please consult a licensed attorney.

 

February 18, 2025
Posted on Author By admin Categories General

Do Police Have to Read me My Rights in Prescott?

Were Your Miranda Rights Violated in Prescott? Here’s What You Need to Know
Ted Law | Prescott Criminal Defense Attorney

Imagine an America where law enforcement holds absolute power, and citizens have little recourse to protect themselves. Though this may sound extreme, if you’ve ever been in a tense situation with the police in Prescott or anywhere in Yavapai County, you know how important it is to have your Miranda rights upheld. Unfortunately, Miranda rights are sometimes ignored or violated. When that happens, you can use it as part of a robust defense strategy.

Below is an overview of what Miranda rights are, how they apply in Arizona, and how Ted Law can help if your rights were overlooked or denied.

1. What Are Miranda Rights in Yavapai County?

Miranda rights stem from the U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966). These rights require law enforcement to inform individuals in custody about:

  1. Their right to remain silent.

    • Anything you say can be used against you in court.

  2. Their right to legal counsel.

    • You have the right to an attorney—even if you cannot afford one.

Purpose of Miranda Rights

These rights protect citizens from compelled self-incrimination under the 5th Amendment and ensure equal protection under the 6th Amendment. When officers interrogate you without first reading these rights, any statements or evidence they obtain may be excluded or “suppressed” in court.

2. When Do Miranda Rights Apply?

Generally, police must read you your rights if:

  • You’re in custody (meaning a reasonable person would not feel free to leave).
  • They’re about to interrogate you or ask questions designed to get an incriminating response.

Examples of Custodial Situations

  • Being handcuffed and placed in the back of a squad car.
  • Being told you are under arrest or otherwise unable to leave.

If either or both factors (custody + interrogation) aren’t present, Miranda warnings may not be required.

3. Common Crimes Requiring Miranda Warnings

Miranda warnings can apply to any alleged criminal activity in Arizona, such as:

  • Drug crimes
  • Sex crimes
  • Violent crimes
  • Domestic violence
  • White-collar crimes
  • Property crimes
  • Hate crimes

However, if you’re not in custody—for instance, a simple traffic stop—police do not need to read you your rights unless they escalate the situation into a custodial interrogation.

4. Exceptions and Limitations

A. Situations Where Police Need Not Read Miranda

  • Public Safety Questions: Officers may ask quick questions to ensure no imminent threat.
  • Standard Booking Information: Requesting your name and address doesn’t require a Miranda warning.
  • Informant Conversations: If police use an informant to gather info from a suspect in jail, it may not count as formal interrogation.
  • Routine Traffic Stops: A brief traffic stop is typically considered non-custodial unless it evolves into a more formal arrest scenario.

B. When Evidence Is Still Admissible Despite a Violation

  • Public Safety: If answers are given to protect the public from immediate danger, they can be admissible.
  • Witness Discovery: Even if Miranda warnings were not given, police might identify new witnesses who can lawfully testify.
  • Tangible Evidence: Physical items found may be admissible if they would have been “inevitably discovered” by lawful means.
  • Impeachment: Incriminating statements—even if obtained unlawfully—may be used later if you testify and contradict those statements at trial.

5. Determining If Your Rights Were Violated

  1. Custody: Would a reasonable person in your situation believe they were free to leave?
  2. Interrogation: Were the police asking pointed questions likely to elicit incriminating responses?
  3. No Miranda Warning: Did officers fail to inform you of your right to remain silent and your right to counsel before questioning?

If both custody and interrogation occurred without proper Miranda warnings, any statements or evidence directly obtained might be excluded. However, keep in mind that exclusion is not automatic; you or your attorney must raise the issue.

6. “Why Didn’t Police Read Me My Rights?”

You might not have been “Mirandized” because:

  • Officers deemed it a non-custodial interaction.
  • They only asked simple or clarifying questions, not an interrogation.
  • They believed an exception applied (e.g., urgent public safety concerns).

Regardless, don’t assume the police acted lawfully. Consult with a Prescott criminal defense lawyer to verify whether the omission of Miranda warnings was permissible.

7. How a Miranda Violation Affects Your Defense

A violation could result in:

  • Motions to Suppress Evidence: Any confessions or information gleaned during the unlawful interrogation can be excluded.
  • Possible Dismissal of Charges: If critical evidence is thrown out, the State’s case may collapse.
  • Leverage in Plea Bargains: Reduced evidence often means a weaker prosecution, giving you more room to negotiate.

8. Contact a Prescott Defense Attorney Today

At Ted Law, we’re dedicated to protecting your constitutional rights. If you suspect your Miranda rights were violated, our team will:

  1. Investigate Your Arrest
    • Review bodycam footage, police reports, and witness statements.
  2. File Necessary Motions
    • Motion to suppress or exclude any illegally obtained evidence.
  3. Fight for the Best Outcome
    • Whether it’s case dismissal, reduced charges, or a plea deal, we’ll pursue the path that benefits you most.

Call (928) 776-1782 or reach out online for a free consultation. We’ll evaluate your situation, explain your legal options, and work to build a solid defense on your behalf.

February 10, 2025
Posted on Author By admin Categories General

Aggravated vs Normal Assault in Prescott: ARS 13-1204

Few criminal charges sound as severe as “assault.” It suggests significant harm to someone’s safety and wellbeing. However, in Arizona, simple assault is often treated as a misdemeanor. The more serious aggravated assault charge arises when additional circumstances “aggravate” a simple assault. Here’s what you need to know about aggravated assault in Prescott and how you can protect your rights if you’re facing charges.

 

1. What Constitutes “Simple Assault” in Arizona?

Under A.R.S. § 13-1203, an assault can occur if someone:

  1. Intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes physical injury to another person.
  2. Intentionally places another in reasonable apprehension of imminent physical injury.
  3. Knowingly touches another person with the intent to injure, insult, or provoke.

These actions typically result in misdemeanor charges. But if additional, aggravating factors are present, the charge escalates to aggravated assault.

2. When Does an Assault Become “Aggravated”?

A.R.S. § 13-1204 outlines various conditions that can elevate a simple assault to aggravated assault, including:

  1. Serious Physical Injury
    • Causing substantial harm that goes beyond minor bruises or scrapes.
  2. Use of a Deadly Weapon or Dangerous Instrument
    • Even a simulated deadly weapon can trigger aggravated charges.
  3. Significant Bodily Harm
    • Temporary but substantial disfigurement or loss/impairment of a body part.
  4. Restraint or Reduced Capacity to Resist
    • If the victim was bound or their capacity to fight back was significantly impaired.
  5. Home Invasion
    • Entering someone else’s private residence intending to commit assault.
  6. Age Factors
    • If the alleged assailant is 18 or older and the victim is under 15.
  7. Violation of an Order of Protection
    • Any prohibited contact or physical act while under a restraining order.
  8. Status of the Victim
    • Examples include peace officers, firefighters, teachers, healthcare workers, prosecutors, code enforcement officers, or park rangers acting in their official duties.
  9. Choking or Strangulation
    • Intentionally restricting another person’s breathing or blood circulation.
  10. Custody Situations
  • If the assault occurs while the defendant is in prison or under correctional supervision, and the victim is working in an official capacity within that facility.

Any one of these factors can turn a misdemeanor assault into a felony charge.

3. Potential Consequences of an Aggravated Assault Conviction

All forms of aggravated assault in Arizona are felonies, which means:

  • Possible Prison Sentences
    • May include mandatory prison terms for certain offenses.
  • Extended Probation
    • Upon release, probation conditions can be lengthy and restrictive.
  • Long-Term Impact
    • Felony convictions can affect employment, housing, loans, and other essentials.

Even a lesser felony designation can create major roadblocks for your future.

4. Facing Aggravated Assault Charges in Prescott?

If you’re accused of aggravated assault, do not navigate this alone. A felony conviction can devastate your life—jeopardizing your job, finances, and personal relationships. You need a proactive, experienced legal team on your side.

Why Choose Ted Agnick?

Ted Agnick, DUI & Criminal Attorney, has handled a wide range of assault cases, including complex aggravated assault charges. Our team knows how to:

  1. Examine the Evidence
    • Look at police reports, witness statements, and any available surveillance.
  2. Identify Defenses
    • Could self-defense or defense of others apply? Was there a misunderstanding or lack of intent?
  3. Negotiate or Fight in Court
    • We aim to reduce or dismiss charges, or build a strong courtroom defense if needed.

5. Take Action Today

Call (928) 776-1782 or visit our office at 140 N Montezuma Street, Prescott, AZ 86301. We offer a FREE CONSULTATION, so you can discuss your situation confidentially and learn how we can help. The sooner you act, the better your chances of achieving the best possible outcome.

Disclaimer: This content is provided for general informational purposes and should not be considered legal advice. For counsel specific to your circumstances, please consult a qualified attorney.

January 28, 2025
Posted on Author By admin Categories Criminal Defense

Affirmative vs. Justification Defenses for Criminal Law in Prescott

When facing criminal charges in Arizona, most people know the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However, Arizona law also allows defendants to raise specific defenses—affirmative or justification—that can significantly influence the outcome of a criminal case. Below is an overview of how these defenses differ, why they matter, and how partnering with an experienced Prescott criminal defense attorney can make all the difference.

A humorous yet respectful depiction of a lawyer in a courtroom. The lawyer is wearing a sharp suit but has a slightly quirky detail

1. Affirmative Defenses

Under A.R.S. § 13-205, an affirmative defense shifts the burden to the defendant. You must prove an affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence—a lower standard than the State’s requirement of “beyond a reasonable doubt,” but a burden on the defense nonetheless.

Examples of Affirmative Defenses

  1. Entrapment
    • Claiming law enforcement induced you to commit a crime you wouldn’t have committed otherwise.
  2. Inoperability of a Firearm
    • Relevant in Misconduct Involving Weapons charges, showing the weapon couldn’t function can negate certain elements of the offense.
  3. Lack of Sexual Interest
    • Used in specific sex-related cases to demonstrate the required intent wasn’t present.
  4. Using a Drug as Prescribed
    • Often invoked in DUI cases if you were following medical advice and the prescribed dosage.

Since you must establish these defenses, having skilled legal counsel to collect and present evidence is critical.

2. Justification Defenses

In contrast, justification defenses do not require you to prove anything. Under amendments to A.R.S. § 13-205 in 2006, once you introduce some evidence supporting a justification defense, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were not justified.

Common Justification Defenses

  1. Self-Defense
    • Using force to protect yourself from immediate physical harm.
  2. Defense of Property
    • Reasonable actions to prevent unlawful interference with your possessions or home.
  3. Defense of a Third Party
    • Intervening to protect someone else from imminent danger.
  4. Use of Force in Crime Prevention
    • Taking necessary steps to prevent a serious criminal act.
  5. Duress
    • Arguing you committed an offense because another person threatened you with immediate harm or death.

With justification defenses, the burden falls back on the prosecution to disprove the defense once it’s raised.

3. Why These Defenses Matter

  • Reduced or Dismissed Charges: Properly presented defenses can weaken or eliminate the prosecution’s case.
  • Avoid Heavy Penalties: The difference between an acquittal and a felony conviction often hinges on your defense strategy.
  • Protect Your Future: Criminal convictions can affect employment, housing, and personal rights—making a robust defense critical.

4. Building a Strong Defense in Prescott

Whether you opt for an affirmative or justification defense depends on evidence, witness testimony, and case-specific details. A knowledgeable Prescott attorney will:

  1. Evaluate Your Situation
    • Examine police reports, witness statements, and any available surveillance footage.
  2. Identify Applicable Defenses
    • Determine which defense approach—affirmative or justification—offers the strongest position.
  3. Present a Convincing Argument
    • Craft and deliver a persuasive case before a judge or jury, making sure the State’s burden of proof remains in focus.

5. Contact Ted Agnick for Your Free Consultation

If you’re facing criminal charges in Prescott or the surrounding areas, don’t go it alone. Attorney Ted Agnick has the experience and insight to help you raise the right defenses effectively.

  • Location: 140 N Montezuma Street, Prescott, AZ 86301
  • Phone: (928) 776-1782
  • FREE CONSULTATION: Call today to discuss your case and learn how we can protect your rights.

Don’t let confusion over affirmative or justification defenses jeopardize your freedom. Contact us now to explore every legal avenue and build a defense tailored to your situation.

Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. For guidance specific to your circumstances, consult a qualified attorney.

January 14, 2025
Posted on Author By admin Categories General

Selling Tobacco to a Minor

Recent federal announcements aiming to curb what’s called an “epidemic” of youth e-cigarette use may soon lead to stricter regulations—and potentially new criminal enforcement—on the sale of flavored vape products. While the exact scope of these forthcoming FDA policies remains unclear, one thing is certain: Arizona already has broad, stringent laws regarding the sale of tobacco products (including e-cigarettes) to minors.

A humorous and realistic depiction of a young-looking undercover police officer attempting to buy cigarettes at a convenience store.

Arizona’s Tough Stance on Selling Tobacco to Minors

Under A.R.S. § 13-3622, it’s a petty offense for anyone to sell, give, or otherwise provide tobacco—whether cigarettes, chewing tobacco, snus, or any “vapor product”—to a minor. Arizona law makes no distinction between flavored and non-flavored tobacco; all nicotine-derived products fall under the same umbrella. The consequences can include:

  1. Fines and Penalties: Both individual clerks and the establishments they work for can be penalized.
  2. Licensing Difficulties: Businesses found in violation may face obstacles when renewing or maintaining operational licenses.
  3. Broad Accountability: Store owners, employees, and even the corporations behind them can be held responsible for illegal sales.

With the federal government’s push to remove certain e-cigarettes from store shelves, Arizona’s preexisting rules could intersect with new federal regulations in ways that make compliance even more complicated.

Why It Matters to Arizona Businesses

  • Higher Enforcement: The FDA’s policy changes might inspire more aggressive state or local checks on vaping product sales.
  • Legal Exposure: Small shops, larger chains, and individual clerks risk fines, licensing issues, or other penalties.
  • Uncertain Future: As rules evolve, misunderstanding or accidentally violating them can trigger costly legal battles.

Protecting Yourself or Your Business

If you or your company face accusations of selling tobacco or e-cigarettes to a minor, don’t wait to act:

  1. Seek Legal Counsel Immediately
    • A knowledgeable attorney can help interpret the relevant Arizona statutes and any emerging federal guidelines.
  2. Review Your Policies
    • Make sure employees know how to verify age correctly and maintain compliance with local and federal laws.
  3. Respond Quickly to Allegations
    • Early intervention can significantly reduce the risk of severe penalties or license suspensions.

Talk to a Prescott Criminal Defense Attorney Today

At Ted Agnick | DUI & Criminal Attorney, we understand how seemingly small infractions—like an employee mistakenly selling a vape product—can create big headaches for local businesses. Our team has experience defending individuals and companies against Arizona’s stringent underage tobacco laws, and we stand ready to help you navigate the complexities of new federal e-cigarette policies.

  • Location: 140 N Montezuma Street, Prescott, AZ 86301
  • Call Now: (928) 776-1782
  • FREE CONSULTATION: Protect your rights, your business, and your license by speaking with us at no cost.

We’re here to guide you through every step of the legal process and to develop a defense strategy tailored to your situation. Contact us today to learn how we can help.

January 9, 2025
Posted on Author By admin Categories Criminal Defense

Intoxication Defense

Facing Criminal Charges You Don’t Remember? Intoxication Defenses in Arizona

Blacking out from alcohol or drugs can be unsettling—especially if you later discover you’ve been accused of committing a crime you don’t even remember. In Arizona, the law recognizes two types of intoxication: involuntary and voluntary. The distinction can significantly affect your defense if you’re facing criminal charges. Below is an overview of both categories and how they might apply to your case.

 

Involuntary Intoxication

Definition

  • Occurs when a person becomes intoxicated against their will or without their knowledge (e.g., if someone unknowingly spikes your drink).
  • Because you had no intent to consume drugs or alcohol, Arizona law allows a jury to consider this lack of intent when determining whether you had the required mental state to commit a crime.

Potential Impact on Your Defense

  • If you can prove the intoxication was involuntary (e.g., drugged without consent), it may negate the specific intent needed for certain charges.
  • Every situation is unique; you’ll need to gather evidence (such as witness statements or medical reports) to support your claim of involuntary intoxication.

Voluntary Intoxication

Definition

  • Occurs when someone knowingly consumes alcohol or drugs that can cause intoxication.
  • Under Arizona law, it generally doesn’t excuse criminal behavior, because individuals are assumed to understand the risks of impaired judgment once they start drinking or using drugs.

Exceptions to Voluntary Intoxication

  1. Medical Advice
    • If you take medication as prescribed by a healthcare professional, you may have a valid defense if the drug impairs you in unexpected ways.
  2. Duress
    • Extremely rare scenarios where you’re forced to consume intoxicants under threat of harm.
    • Duress is difficult to prove under Arizona law.

Limited Use as a Defense

  • Voluntary intoxication rarely negates guilt.
  • Prosecutors may still argue that by choosing to drink or use drugs, you bear responsibility for any subsequent actions.

Why You Need a Strong Defense

Lack of Memory Isn’t a Defense

  • Simply not remembering what happened does not excuse criminal liability. Prosecutors can still build a case based on witness statements, surveillance footage, and other evidence.

Prosecution May Argue Impairment

  • If you voluntarily consumed drugs or alcohol, prosecutors can claim you knowingly put yourself in a position where a crime could be committed—regardless of whether you recall the event.

Protect Your Rights: Call Ted Law in Phoenix, AZ

If you’re facing criminal charges tied to an incident you can’t fully recall, don’t leave your future to chance. You need an experienced legal team to help build your defense, gather the right evidence, and challenge the prosecution’s claims.

  • Free Consultation: Speak with Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law about your situation.
  • Local Expertise: We understand Arizona’s intoxication laws and have a track record of defending clients across Phoenix and the surrounding areas.
  • Strategic Defense: We’ll examine whether involuntary intoxication applies or if other defenses are available to you.

Call (602) 453-3100 or contact us online today to discuss your case. We’re here 24/7 to help you navigate Arizona’s legal system and protect your rights.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique; consult an attorney for advice specific to your circumstances.

January 6, 2025
Posted on Author By admin Categories DUI

Can I Refuse Field Sobriety Tests?

Refusing a DUI Test in Prescott, Arizona: What You Need to Know

Arizona‘s implied consent law provides that anyone lawfully arrested for suspicion of driving under the influence is presumed to have consented to a blood, breath, or urine test. If one fails to submit or not expressly consent, there are severe repercussions, including license suspension. The following is an overview of the implied consent laws in Arizona, what happens if you refuse to take a chemical test, and how to protect your driving privileges in Prescott and throughout the state.

A-realistic-and-humorous-depiction-of-a-very-indecisive-person-performing-field-sobriety-tests-on-the-side-of-a-road.-The-person-is-visibly-conflicted

Understanding Implied Consent in Arizona

Definition: According to A.R.S. § 28-1321, in Arizona, drivers are considered to consent to a chemical test of their blood, breath, or urine if lawfully arrested on suspicion of DUI.
Scope: This is applicable for motorists stopped by police officers with probable cause to suspect impairment, provided there was no malicious intent during the arrest.
If you refuse to submit to a chemical test, you are required to immediately surrender your driver‘s license. The arresting officer will then prepare a report that will automatically suspend your license for at least 12 months for first-time offenders.

Consequences of Refusing a Chemical Test

First-Time Refusal
License Suspension: You will face a 12-month suspension of your driving privileges.
Temporary Driving Permit: You will be given a 15-day temporary permit. You will have a short period to drive legally while you contemplate your legal options.
Ignition Interlock: You must serve at least 90 consecutive days of suspension before you may request an ignition interlock license.


Second Refusal Within Seven Years
License Suspension: You will face a 24-month suspension, two years, of your driving privileges.
Heavier Penalties: Second and subsequent refusals are considered habitual and hence attract heavier penalties.


What Happens After Refusal?

  1. Immediate License SurrenderYouwill be asked to immediately surrender your driver‘s license to the arresting officer.
    You are given a temporary driving permit that is valid for only 15 days.

       2. Suspension Begins

        You have 15 days in which you can request a hearing to challenge the suspension.
        If you fail to request a hearing, the suspension becomes final.


        3. Administrative Hearing

The hearing determines whether the officer had reasonable cause to believe DUI.
You may argue matters like the legality of the arrest, your knowledge of the refusal consequences and results of tests.

         4. Disposition

         Withdrawn: If the hearing officer decides in your favor, then the suspension is withdrawn
         Sustained: Otherwise, the suspension remains, and you will have to serve it entirely


Was Refusing a Good Idea?

Refusal of a chemical test has several consequences:

Evidence in Court
Prosecutors can argue that refusal is indicative of guilt-that you refused to take the test because you were intoxicated.

License Suspension
One certainty with refusal is the suspension, which may be shorter than the suspension one faces after being convicted of DUI, but nonetheless burdensome.

Risk of Conviction
Refusal does not necessarily mean you will not be convicted. Other evidence can be used against you, such as officer observations, field sobriety tests, or open container laws.
This is sometimes less destructive than having a positive high BAC, but it‘s a risk. If you refuse to take a chemical test, you will need to have aggressive legal representation to fight any resulting charges effectively.

Protect Your Rights in Prescott, Arizona
If you’ve been arrested for DUI or are considering refusing a chemical test, timely legal assistance can make all the difference. An experienced attorney can:
-Review the Arrest Details: Investigate whether the officer had proper cause.
-Challenge the Suspension: File a request for a hearing and contest the automatic suspension within 15 days.
-Build a Defense Strategy: Ensure your constitutional rights were respected and work to minimize penalties.

Contact an Experienced DUI Defense Attorney
Being stopped for a DUI in Prescott is stressful, especially considering whether to refuse a blood, breath, or urine test. You don‘t have to go through all these difficulties on your own. A qualified DUI lawyer will be able to guide you through Arizona‘s implied consent laws, defend you against severe punishments, and protect your driving privileges.

Act now:

Call today to a trusted DUI defense attorney immediately to protect your rights.
Request a hearing to contest the automatic suspension within 15 days of your arrest.
Be proactive in knowing all of your options to best advocate your case.

December 27, 2024
Posted on Author By admin Categories General

Arizona Teenage Driver Laws

Arizona Teen Driving Law: Everything Parents and Teens Need to Know

Arizona has implemented teen driving limits aimed at reducing the number of fatal crashes involving young drivers. If you or your child holds a Class G (Graduated) license or is preparing to obtain one, it’s crucial to understand these regulations. Failing to follow them can lead to fines, penalties, and even license suspensions. Below is an overview of Arizona’s teen driving laws, including the 2018 mobile device ban for teens and the requirements to obtain and maintain a graduated driver’s license.

A-realistic-depiction-of-a-teenager-driving-a-car-wearing-a-rainbow-colored-propeller-hat-with-a-spinning-propeller-on-top

Arizona’s Graduated Permit (Instruction Permit)

  • Age Requirement: At least 15 years and 6 months old.
  • Written Test: Teen drivers must pass a state-approved written exam.
  • Supervision Requirement: A Class A, B, C, or D licensed driver must sit in the passenger seat next to the teen at all times while the teen operates the vehicle.

Holding an Arizona instruction permit is the first step toward obtaining a Class G (Graduated) license.

Class G (Graduated) Driver’s License in Arizona

Teens between 16 and 18 years old may be issued a Class G license if:

  1. They have held an Arizona instruction permit for at least 6 months, OR
  2. They have a valid driver’s license from another state, AND
  3. They have completed an MVD-approved driver’s education course OR their parent or guardian certifies completion of 30 hours of supervised driving (10 of which must be at night).

Nighttime Driving Restrictions

  • No driving from 12:00 AM to 5:00 AM without a parent or legal guardian present in the vehicle.
  • Exceptions: Traveling to or from a school-sponsored event, a sanctioned religious activity, a family emergency, or to/from work.

Passenger Limitations

  • No more than one passenger under 18 is allowed in the vehicle unless a parent or legal guardian with a valid license is seated in the front passenger seat. Siblings under 18 are typically allowed if the parent/legal guardian is present.

Moving to an Unrestricted License

  • After 6 months of restricted driving, teens may drive without these specific time or passenger restrictions until they turn 18.
  • Once the teen is 18, they can apply for a Class D license, which carries no teen-specific restrictions.

Teen Motorcycle Permit (Class M)

  • Minimum Age: 15 years, 6 months.
  • Parent/Guardian Involvement: Must consent to the application and provide necessary documentation.
  • Exams & Practice: Applicant must pass a vision and written test and show proof of 30 hours of supervised practice riding, or completion of a certified motorcycle safety course.

Banning Wireless Device Use for Teen Drivers

Put down the phone and watch the road! In 2018, Arizona prohibited drivers with a Class G license from using wireless communication devices—including mobile phones—during the permit phase and first six months after obtaining a Class G license.

  • Exceptions:
    • Emergency Situations: Where stopping the vehicle is impossible or dangerous.
    • Navigation Systems: Turn-by-turn directions are permitted if set before driving and do not require manual interaction.

Secondary Enforcement

Law enforcement cannot pull over teen drivers solely for phone usage. Officers must first observe a different driving infraction (e.g., speeding, running a stop sign). However, once stopped, police can cite the teen for illegal phone use.

Consequences of Violating Teen Driving Laws

  • Fines & Mandatory Traffic School: Even a first offense can result in fines and required defensive driving courses.
  • License Suspension & Revocation: Repeat offenses can lead to a suspended or even revoked license.
  • Impact on Future Driving: Violations can increase insurance premiums and remain on the teen’s driving record.

What If My Teen Is Arrested or Charged?

If your teen is arrested or charged with violating driving laws—or any other traffic or juvenile offense—acting quickly to protect their rights is crucial. A conviction could affect insurance rates, future employment, and even college admissions.

Call Ted Law for Skilled Representation

Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law is dedicated to helping families navigate Arizona’s teen driving laws. We understand the complexities of both traffic and juvenile courts and will work tirelessly to protect your child’s driving privileges and legal rights.

  • Immediate Guidance: Get clarity on what to do next.
  • Defense Strategies: Build a robust defense to minimize penalties and maintain your teen’s driving record.
  • Comprehensive Support: Handle all legal filings, court appearances, and negotiations with prosecutors.

Don’t face these challenges alone. Call (602) 453-3100 or reach out online for a free consultation. We’re available 24/7 to answer your questions and provide the experienced legal counsel your family needs during this stressful time.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique, and you should consult an attorney for guidance specific to your circumstances.

December 18, 2024
Posted on Author By admin Categories Sex Crimes

Can You Stop Registering as a Sex Offender in Arizona?

For the vast majority of individuals, the requirement to register as a sex offender in Arizona is a lifetime commitment. However, there is one narrow exception. If you were convicted under A.R.S. § 13-1405 (Sexual Conduct with a Minor) and met specific criteria, you may be able to file a petition to terminate your registration requirement. Understanding whether this exception applies to you is crucial for regaining your freedom and moving forward with your life.

A nerdy teenage boy standing at a neighbor's doorway, introducing himself while wearing an ankle tracking device. The teenager has thick glasses, slig

Who Qualifies for the Exception?

To be considered eligible for termination of sex offender registration, all of the following criteria must be met:

  1. Age at the Time of the Offense:
    You were under 22 years old when you committed the offense.
  2. Victim’s Age:
    The victim was 15, 16, or 17 years old.
  3. Consent:
    The sexual conduct was consensual.
  4. Probation Compliance:
    While on probation, you did not violate any sex-offender-related terms.
  5. No Additional Offenses:
    You have not committed any other felony or sex-related offense under Chapter 14 or 35.1 of Title 13.
  6. No Sexually Violent Person Designation:
    No court has determined that you are a sexually violent person, and no such proceedings are pending.
  7. Single Victim and No Prison Sentence:
    There was only one victim, and you were not sentenced to prison for the offense requiring registration.

If each of these requirements is satisfied, you can file a petition to terminate your sex offender registration. Once filed, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that you do not meet one or more criteria. If the prosecution succeeds on any point, your petition will be denied.

Court Discretion Still Applies

Even if you meet every requirement, the court retains the discretion to deny your petition if it determines that continued registration is necessary to serve the interests of justice or ensure the public’s safety. This underscores the importance of working with an experienced attorney who knows how to present a compelling case on your behalf.

Why You Need an Experienced Attorney

Terminating sex offender registration is a complex legal process that involves navigating Arizona’s intricate laws and convincing a judge that you no longer pose a risk to the community. With so much at stake, it’s vital to work with a seasoned Phoenix sex crimes attorney who understands the law, the court system, and the arguments needed to help you achieve the desired outcome.

Contact Ted Law for Skilled Representation

Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law is dedicated to helping clients regain their freedom from sex offender registration requirements. With extensive knowledge of Arizona’s sex crime statutes and proven legal strategies, we can:

  • Evaluate your eligibility for petitioning to terminate registration.
  • Gather and present strong evidence to counter the prosecution’s claims.
  • Advocate effectively in court, aiming to convince the judge that continued registration isn’t necessary.

Call (602) 453-3100 or reach out online today for a free, confidential consultation. We are available 24/7 to discuss your case and explore the legal options that could free you from a lifetime of registration, so you can move forward with your life.

December 14, 2024
Posted on Author By admin Categories Defense Strategies

Can I Shoot a Carjacker in Arizona?

Owning a firearm often comes with a sense of security—whether it’s for hunting, sport, or defending yourself and your property. But what if you catch someone in the act of stealing your car? Does Arizona law allow you to use deadly force to stop them?

Unfortunately, the answer is not straightforward. The legality of using deadly force in this scenario depends heavily on the circumstances. If you have additional questions after reading this overview, contact Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law for experienced, personalized legal guidance.

Owning a firearm often comes with a sense of security—whether it’s for hunting, sport, or defending yourself and your property. But what if you catch someone in the act of stealing your car? Does Arizona law allow you to use deadly force to stop them? Unfortunately, the answer is not straightforward. The legality of using deadly force in this scenario depends heavily on the circumstances. If you have additional questions after reading this overview, contact Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law for experienced, personalized legal guidance. Understanding Arizona’s Self-Defense Laws for Property Protection Under A.R.S. § 13-408, you’re justified in using physical force to prevent theft or criminal damage to your property if a reasonable person would believe it necessary. However, using deadly physical force in defense of property alone is generally not allowed—deadly force is reserved for situations where there is an immediate and reasonable belief of a serious threat to life or safety. In simpler terms: While you may be able to use non-deadly force to stop someone from stealing your car, using a firearm to shoot a thief is rarely justified unless other factors elevate the situation to a life-threatening encounter. When is Deadly Force Permissible? Self-Defense or Defense of Others (A.R.S. § 13-405 and § 13-406): You may use deadly force if the car thief uses or attempts to use deadly physical force against you or another person. If a reasonable person would believe deadly force is immediately necessary to prevent serious harm, then shooting may be justified. Preventing Certain Violent Crimes (A.R.S. § 13-411): If the car thief is committing a qualifying crime—such as burglary in the first degree (unlawfully entering or remaining in your car with the intent to commit theft while possessing a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument)—you may be justified in using deadly force. Again, the key is that a reasonable person would believe deadly force is immediately necessary to prevent the crime. Context Matters: Was the thief armed? Did the thief threaten you or someone else with deadly force? Were they forcibly entering an occupied vehicle? Did they display a weapon? All of these details matter and can influence whether or not deadly force is seen as reasonable and necessary. Why You Need an Experienced Attorney If you’ve discharged a firearm to prevent a car theft, you could still face criminal charges. Arizona’s self-defense laws are complex, and each case is unique. Working with an experienced Phoenix firearms defense attorney is essential to protect your rights and avoid unjust prosecution. Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law can: Thoroughly investigate your case, gathering evidence to support your claim of justified self-defense. Help you understand Arizona’s laws, how they apply to your situation, and the potential defenses available. Advocate on your behalf, working diligently to achieve the best possible outcome. Call Ted Law for a Free Consultation When your future is on the line, don’t face the legal system alone. Contact Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law for experienced, knowledgeable legal representation. Call (602) 453-3100 or reach out online to schedule a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’re available 24/7 to help you navigate the complexities of Arizona’s self-defense statutes and protect your rights after a shooting incident.

Understanding Arizona’s Self-Defense Laws for Property Protection

Under A.R.S. § 13-408, you’re justified in using physical force to prevent theft or criminal damage to your property if a reasonable person would believe it necessary. However, using deadly physical force in defense of property alone is generally not allowed—deadly force is reserved for situations where there is an immediate and reasonable belief of a serious threat to life or safety.

In simpler terms: While you may be able to use non-deadly force to stop someone from stealing your car, using a firearm to shoot a thief is rarely justified unless other factors elevate the situation to a life-threatening encounter.

When is Deadly Force Permissible?

  1. Self-Defense or Defense of Others (A.R.S. § 13-405 and § 13-406):
    You may use deadly force if the car thief uses or attempts to use deadly physical force against you or another person. If a reasonable person would believe deadly force is immediately necessary to prevent serious harm, then shooting may be justified.
  2. Preventing Certain Violent Crimes (A.R.S. § 13-411):
    If the car thief is committing a qualifying crime—such as burglary in the first degree (unlawfully entering or remaining in your car with the intent to commit theft while possessing a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument)—you may be justified in using deadly force. Again, the key is that a reasonable person would believe deadly force is immediately necessary to prevent the crime.

Context Matters:

  • Was the thief armed?
  • Did the thief threaten you or someone else with deadly force?
  • Were they forcibly entering an occupied vehicle?
  • Did they display a weapon?

All of these details matter and can influence whether or not deadly force is seen as reasonable and necessary.

Why You Need an Experienced Attorney

If you’ve discharged a firearm to prevent a car theft, you could still face criminal charges. Arizona’s self-defense laws are complex, and each case is unique. Working with an experienced Phoenix firearms defense attorney is essential to protect your rights and avoid unjust prosecution.

Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law can:

  • Thoroughly investigate your case, gathering evidence to support your claim of justified self-defense.
  • Help you understand Arizona’s laws, how they apply to your situation, and the potential defenses available.
  • Advocate on your behalf, working diligently to achieve the best possible outcome.

Call Ted Law for a Free Consultation

When your future is on the line, don’t face the legal system alone. Contact Attorney Theodore Agnick at Ted Law for experienced, knowledgeable legal representation.

Call (602) 453-3100 or reach out online to schedule a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’re available 24/7 to help you navigate the complexities of Arizona’s self-defense statutes and protect your rights after a shooting incident.

Disclaimer: This information is for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with an attorney regarding your unique situation.

1 2 3 4 5